For executives and managers who are too busy to plod through the ~50 different Developer AI ROI graphs offered by GitClear, we offer the AI Scorecard. The charts on this tab reveal which models are delivering the most value for the various types of tasks your team undertakes.
The data presented by the AI Scorecard charts requires that a customer has either installed the GitClear Telemetry package or connected GitClear to a proxy that allows prompt category to be parsed from proxy logs |
The first section breaks down which AI providers the team has been most engaged with during the time period selected.

The left side aggregates all of the AI usage that has been cataloged from the sum of the APIs you connected to, plus the telemetry you have connected. The right side counts all of the developer-weeks during the time period in question, and colors the dots on the basis of the relative AI use for one developer on one week. A grid of intense green is a team that is fully engaged with using AI every single week. A graph with more light dots or gray dots is a team whose AI engagement fluctuates depending on task & engagement.
One of the constant questions to leaders who want to deploy their AI spend to maximum effect: how much of the code that these models write is going to make it to the deployed final product, vs get churned somewhere on the way to deployment. This view gives you a team- or company-specific look into the quality of the different AI models your team is using.

A glimpse into what percent of each models' authored lines makes it through pull request and persists through to day 60
When you see models that quickly plunge from "being generated" to "being in a submitted pull request," that is signal that the models are writing code that tends not to survive the scrutiny of a experienced developers.
On the other hand, when you see models with a high durability, that suggests that you might be able to lighten the pull request review expectations, if there are certain models with especially high persistence at Day 60.
Note that, if you have installed the AI Telemetry packages, you can facet this data by which type of prompt was used. GitClear recognizes about 20 different categories of LLM prompt, and you can see how the "model usage durability" varies for one type of prompt vs. another. For example, you might find that most LLMs have a much higher percentage of code retained when they are working on "greenfield feature implementation" vs "library upgrades."
Zooming out, how many weeks during the currently-selected time range witnessed the team's developers being vigorously engaged with AI tooling? The AI Cohort Mix has answers:

The AI Cohort offers a sense of how engaged the active developers were with their AI tooling
The Task-Model ROI Matrix is one of GitClear's most data-rich charts. It allows you to see, on a per-model and per-intent basis, several Metric views:
Best value: How much was spent per LLM session for code generated by each combination of model+intent, after factoring out the code that was removed or revised within 30 days after it was initially authored?
Lowest inference cost: Which model has generated the most code per dollar spent?
Fastest result: Which model+intent has completed a task most promptly? If you're being a prototype, this helps guide which models to prefer
Lowest revision risk: Which model(s) are writing code that's good enough to withstand human review & being utilized by customers after deploy?
Least steering: Which model(s) can complete a task with the fewest prompts from the developer?
The matrix helps a team build intuition for which model should be preferred for a given category of task:

Each matrix cell requires at least 10 LLM sessions to build enough confidence to present a statistically significant result. For a team of 100 developers with GitClear Telemetry installed, this usually takes around 2-3 weeks to build enough data that the cells can be calculated.